Readers write: Fighting for land, and progress

Letters to the editor from the Jan. 22 Weekly. Readers discussed progress made in 2023, battles for land rights, and resistance to climate-saving policy.

Missing the big picture

The Nov. 27 Weekly cover story headline states the bitter irony quite well: “Suing the world to save it.” 

Due to the “only if it’s in my own backyard” mindset, the prevailing collective attitude, however implicit or subconscious, basically follows: “What’s in it for me, the taxpayer?” or “Why should I care? My family is immediately all right.” 

While some people will justify it as normal, and thus moral, the self-serving mindset can debilitate social progress, even when such progress is so desperately needed – such as trying to moderate human-made global warming.

Collective human existence is still basically analogous to a cafeteria lineup consisting of diversely represented people, all adamantly arguing over who should be at the front and, conversely, at the back of the line.

Many of them further fight over who should receive the last piece of quality pie and how much they should have to pay for it – all while the interstellar spaceship on which they’re permanently confined, and which is owned and operated by (besides the wealthiest passengers) the fossil fuel industry, is on fire.

As a species, we can be so heavily preoccupied with our own individual little worlds, however overwhelming to us, that we miss the biggest of pictures.

Frank Sterle Jr.
White Rock, British Columbia

The fight for land 

I thank the Monitor for two articles in the Dec. 11 Weekly: “Why one grandmother’s house has become a national cause” and the cover story, “In a return to forgotten lands, young farmers go small, demand less.”

The first calls attention to an easily overlooked problem that has major implications for social justice in the United States: the loss of ancestral lands and Indigenous communities by disadvantaged groups, in this case African Americans of the Sea Islands off the Southern coast. The article provides some hope that new legislation and activism can help to reverse this trend.

The second article takes a look at why some young people are returning to the land to practice sustainable agriculture, and how this can address the effects of a warming planet, toxic consumerism, and unsatisfying lifestyles driven by monetary concerns. The focus on a less familiar region of Portugal makes the article especially interesting, and helps to show the breadth of this movement.

It is encouraging to see greater attention to these problems, and some progress in addressing them.

Jennifer Quinn
Abingdon, Virginia

Finding joy and balance 

What a wonderful Monitor Weekly we have in its first publication for 2024 (Jan. 1 and 8)! Its focus on “reflecting on the year’s progress” for 2023 gives such hope in every feature and article. I read nearly all of it in one sitting and finished it the next day.

I was especially touched by the joyous montage of photos from around the world that each Monitor photographer presented. These pictures brought the reader into the world’s family of hearts.

Also, you gave us balanced views about the Mideast conflict in “What Israelis see, and don’t see, about the war in Gaza” and  in “Schooled in ‘social justice,’ more students flock to Palestinian cause.” And your article “To curb migrant numbers, Italy looks to Albania for help” showed a fresh view by reporting on countries that we don’t hear about too often.

I’m sending this issue to my brothers! Much love!

Natalie Coleridge
Alton, Illinois

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Readers write: Fighting for land, and progress
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Readers-Respond/2024/0127/Readers-write-Fighting-for-land-and-progress
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe