Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action shows diversity still matters

Today’s 7-1 Supreme Court decision on affirmative action in University of Texas admissions reaffirms the crucial role that diversity plays in a strong America – even while requiring the university to again jump through hoops to prove the validity of its admissions program.

|
Eric Gay/AP
University of Texas senior Bradley Poole poses for a photo on campus near the Martin Luther King Jr. statue in Austin, Texas, in March.

Today’s 7-1 Supreme Court decision on diversity in the University of Texas admissions program reaffirms the crucial role that diversity plays in the strength of America – even while requiring the university to again jump through hoops to prove the validity of its admissions program.

All students – no matter where they live, or what their race or social status – benefit from a diverse educational  environment where they learn from the life experiences of their classmates, and can carry these experiences with them through their lives.

Retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor recognized this 10 years ago, when she wrote that “classroom discussion is livelier, more spirited, and simply more enlightening and interesting” when students have “the greatest possible variant of backgrounds.”

And today the court renewed that principle, even while it sent the case – Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin – back to a lower court to apply a stricter standard on the university to show that “no workable race-neutral alternatives would produce the educational benefits of diversity,” as Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the lead opinion.

The lower federal court had earlier ruled in favor of the university, and against Abigail Fisher, who claimed in 2008 that the only reason she was denied admission to UT at Austin was because she is white, even though she would not have met the university’s other admissions requirements.

In a country that has great diversity, many of the nation’s most prominent and important institutions still lag far behind. And let there be no doubt, there are some justices, perhaps even a majority, on the court today who would do away with Justice O’Connor’s principle. They may believe that as a nation, the United States has achieved the promise of true quality, but most Americans know otherwise. 

Whites are nearly twice as likely to enroll in college as blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans. And according to recent Census estimates, nearly 65 percent of black adults and 80 percent of Latino adults fail to complete some form of post-secondary education, compared to 50 percent of the white population.

Diverse viewpoints and experiences challenge our beliefs and push us to open our minds to new ideas, new ways, and create a sense of understanding that’s fundamental to success in a modern, wired, global economy. The type of critical thinking that comes from a diverse learning environment is what makes America’s higher education system the best in the world, and prepares graduates to succeed in business, compete in the global marketplace, and contribute to a first class military.

The importance of diversity in higher education is a principled view held not only by universities and minority students. Thirty-seven of the highest-ranking retired US military officials, 57 Fortune 500 companies, more than a dozen religious denominations and groups, and nearly 100 groups representing all racial and ethnic minorities supported Texas’s admission policy.

Today’s Supreme Court decision means that, while the university needs to continue to demonstrate that its methods for creating diversity are appropriate, the court is reaffirming that diversity is a compelling interest. Diversity is a necessary part of ensuring that every college student, regardless of race, can get access to a rich and enlightening educational experience.

Make no mistake: The promise of a quality education – and the creation of diverse learning environments that ensure this quality education – is something universities won’t stop with today. In fact, recent history shows that when courts or new legislative efforts seek to limit or restrict diversity efforts in public schools, colleges seek to find new ways to increase minority admissions. After today, colleges and universities can continue to do so, but Americans are also reminded that the road toward full equality and opportunity in the US is far from finished.

Andrew Blotky is the director of Legal Progress at the Center for American Progress.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action shows diversity still matters
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2013/0624/Supreme-Court-ruling-on-affirmative-action-shows-diversity-still-matters
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe