Can children really lead the way?

In an age of youth-led climate movements, children are leaders. But what motivates them? A climate lawsuit driven by a group of kids in Montana offers an answer.

|
Thom Bridge/Independent Record/AP
Youth plaintiffs in Held v. Montana arrive at the courthouse in Helena, Montana, for the final day of the trial on June 20.

This week's cover story, Part 4 in our seven-part series on the Climate Generation, focuses on a groundbreaking legal victory for a set of 16 plaintiffs, ages 5 to 22. These "climate kids," as the popular press has dubbed them, sued their home state of Montana for neglecting their constitutional rights by not factoring climate change into policies around fossil fuel development. Their victory this summer was hailed as a breakthrough moment for climate change action and more broadly for children's rights.

You wouldn't be alone if you read about this case with a certain degree of skepticism. Were children really behind this lawsuit – or their parents? 

In its defense, the state argued that the children named in the suit were being used by outside interest groups to grab headlines. After all, when the suit was filed, the youngest plaintiff was just 2 years old. 

So when Monitor climate writer Stephanie Hanes set out to report this story, she was particularly interested in exploring just how much agency the young plaintiffs had in the case. What she found was, as you might expect, nuanced.

"Certainly when you’re talking about really little kids, that's a parental choice," she says. "But among the teenagers that I talked to, they were really very independent of their parents."

One teen's choice to join the suit actually put her family in an awkward position within their community, Stephanie says. Her parents support her participation but have declined to give any interviews of their own.

Others plaintiffs have expressed frustration that their involvement could somehow be discounted because of their young age.

Historically speaking, the idea of teens getting involved in political and social actions isn't new. From lunch counter sit-ins in the American South and anti-apartheid uprisings in South Africa to the Velvet Revolution in the former Czechoslovakia and the Arab Spring, young people have long been drivers in movements to spur societal change.

But today's youth activists aren't out to defeat any one foe. What they are advocating for is a global mindset shift in how we all live our lives.

"Everyone has a stake in climate change," says series co-creator Sara Miller Llana. "So these young people see [this potential] to really get the globe engaged in this fight. ... That's really where I see a difference with this struggle than others I've covered."

Members of the Climate Generation are in a stage of life that is all about imagining what kind of adults they want to become. That puts them in a very different position from grown-ups who have built their lives around existing systems. For many of the kids whom Stephanie and Sara met while reporting this series, climate activism is about finding another way to live – and setting an example for others to follow.

"It’s subtler than you might think," Stephanie says. "They are just doing things differently, and not necessarily with a bullhorn or fighting back against the system. They’re just living differently."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Can children really lead the way?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/From-the-Editors/2023/1127/Can-children-really-lead-the-way
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe