Brown v. Board of Education at 70: Promise for students, but still work to be done

|
Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters
Cheryl Brown Henderson (center), daughter of Brown v. Board of Education named plaintiff Oliver Brown, walks out of the West Wing with others including Nathaniel Briggs (right), son of named plaintiff Harry Briggs Jr., after a meeting with President Joe Biden at the White House in Washington, May 16, 2024.
  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 4 Min. )

I was four years into my tenure at a Black-owned newspaper when the city of Augusta, Georgia, voted to lift a decades-old desegregation order back in 2013.

I was skeptical of the move because the promise of progressivism in education had not been fulfilled, evidenced by middling test scores and a literal erasure of the city’s Black educational past. 

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

On the 70th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision, our commentator weighs the promise that decision still offers for students against the realities of what their schools look like today.

I feel a similar ambivalence on the 70th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision from the U.S. Supreme Court that presumably made integration the law of the land. At once, there’s the promise of equity in education for students, regardless of race or economic background. On the other hand, there are the realities of resegregation, which paint a far more grim picture.

American society is largely removed from the staunch physical violence of the Civil Rights Movement, but segregationist attitudes and policies are having an overt effect on schools once more. An April report from the Civil Rights Project at the University of California, Los Angeles, offers a snapshot of the current environment: The proportion of intensely segregated schools rose to 20%, nearly tripling over the past 30 years.  

I was four years into my tenure at a Black-owned newspaper when the city of Augusta, Georgia, voted to lift a decades-old desegregation order back in 2013. I was skeptical of the move because the promise of progressivism in education had not been fulfilled, evidenced by middling test scores and a literal erasure of the city’s Black educational past.

Less than a month after the order was lifted, the school system in Augusta acknowledged plans to tear down the Cauley-Wheeler building, a hallowed and historical structure on the campus of Lucy Craft Laney High School. The house was the last remaining structure from the Haines Normal and Industrial Institute, which Ms. Laney founded in 1886 to educate Black children. There were various times of the year that I would take photos of events on Laney Walker Boulevard, with alumni and enthusiasts in attendance, but when it came to saving a piece of history, one could hear a pin drop in comparison.

I feel a similar ambivalence on the 70th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision from the U.S. Supreme Court that presumably made integration the law of the land. There’s the promise of equity in education for students, regardless of race or economic background. On the other hand, there are the realities of resegregation, which paint a far more grim picture.

Why We Wrote This

A story focused on

On the 70th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision, our commentator weighs the promise that decision still offers for students against the realities of what their schools look like today.

American society is largely removed from the staunch physical violence of the Civil Rights Movement, but segregationist attitudes and policies are having an overt effect on schools once more. An April report from the Civil Rights Project at the University of California, Los Angeles, offers a snapshot of the current environment: The proportion of intensely segregated schools rose to 20%, nearly tripling over the past 30 years.

Library of Congress
Kindergarten children attend school at the Haines Normal and Industrial Institute in Augusta, Georgia. The school was founded in 1886 by Lucy Craft Laney to educate Black students. This photo is believed to have been taken in 1899.

Robert Greene II, a history professor at Claflin University, a historically Black university in Orangeburg, South Carolina, says the legacy of Brown is “that of continued promise.” But, there’s more to it than that. 

“Memorializing Brown v. Board, while also acknowledging the work that remains to be done in education, is critical if we’re going to see positive change in our society,” Dr. Greene writes in an online interview. “Already, there are far too many prominent leaders calling for a retreat from the ideals of Brown v. Board. Part of why we need to keep this alive is to make sure that the legacy becomes real, substantial reform in education.”

In terms of the Black experience, reform was far more revolutionary and hard-fought. While Topeka, Kansas, provided the backdrop for the Brown showdown, dreams of equity in education took root in Clarendon County, South Carolina, in the 1940s. It started with a handful of Black families who aspired to send their kids to school, but the county only bused white children.

Levi Pearson was the first to board up his truck to transport children to and from school, but that only scratched the surface of the injustice they experienced, according to author Claudia Smith Brinson, who writes: “South Carolina spent $221 annually for each white student, $45 for each Black student. The schools serving 2,296 white children in Clarendon County were worth $390,600; the schools serving 6,081 Black children were worth $64,285.”

“Separate but equal,” the law insisted. This put the Pearsons in contact with legendary future Supreme Court justice Thurgood Marshall, who was the NAACP’s special counsel at the time. He filed a suit on the Pearsons’ behalf, but it was dismissed. The Pearsons’ white neighbors were violent, but Levi often said that “I believe God wants me to do it. God wants me to make the sacrifices.”

Charlie Riedel/AP
Students change classes at Topeka High School, May 10, 2024, in Topeka, Kansas. Schools in the city were at the center of the Brown v. Board of Education case that struck down segregated education.

There’s a direct lineage between the champions of Clarendon County and today’s efforts to teach a history that is under siege by local and state governments. Dr. Greene is the lead instructor at the Modjeska Simkins School, which is named for a pioneering educator and activist who helped write the declaration of equality for the lawsuit that called for equal access in Clarendon County.

History knows much about Justice Marshall, whose call to desegregate schools “with all deliberate speed” rings in history books and educational lore. Heroes such as Ms. Simkins, Rev. Joseph DeLaine, and Harry and Eliza Briggs are not as well known. Mr. Briggs was the lead plaintiff of Briggs v. Elliott, the first of five cases that laid the groundwork for Brown.

Amidst this milestone celebration of Brown v. Board, we should do a better job of not just appreciating the everyday people who made the movement, we should also be mindful of the finer details in education. That goes beyond the noise of pitting public and private schools against each other, or incessant and ahistorical railings about critical race theory. For years, people have expressed concerns about a “literacy crisis” in education. Perhaps it’s a challenge of malnutrition; specifically, students who arrive at school unfed. Which again puts economic disparities under rightful scrutiny.

Less than five minutes from the Board of Education building in Augusta there’s a cyber center named after a former governor that has garnered praise for being a forward-thinking effort. There’s a historical marker in front of the parking deck that is not as celebrated – a recognition of Ware High School, which opened in 1880 as the first African American high school in Georgia. The school was closed for financial reasons after the Plessy v. Ferguson decision in 1897, which argued the “separate but equal” ideology that enforced legal segregation.

I ride by that marker twice a week, and when I do, I flash back to the Cauley-Wheeler building, to homecoming parades, to all of the joys and sufferings that make up the constitution of education. And out of the name “Ware,” I am mindful to be aware of what’s going on in education and civics in general. I understand now that living documents alone aren’t enough to preserve the civil rights legacy. Those of us who are living must do our part as well.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Brown v. Board of Education at 70: Promise for students, but still work to be done
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/2024/0517/brown-v-board-of-education-anniversary-70-years-segregation
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe