The sequester is real, but not catastrophic

The sequester – while short-term painful – will likely prove to be not the worst thing in the world and that the economy, the consumer and corporate profits were able to weather it and make it through to the other side, Brown writes.

|
Jason Reed/Reuters/File
A scaled model of the US Capitol building is pictured in the Dirksen Senate building in Washington. Sequestration's impact on the economy will be real, Brown writes, not catastrophic but absolutely real.

Here's what I think...

This past weekend I laid out the case for a pause in the rally that began the week of Thanksgiving.

Beneath the surface of the stock indices themselves, a narrowing of leadership began to asset itself beginning in late January. Momentum was slowing and defensive sectors began coming to the fore throughout February. All of sudden, tech dropped off the new highs radar and materials started to act like, well, like materials again.  This coincided with negative divergences in both core and peripheral Europe. We got some nasty data out of Europe on the economic front and then all hell broke loose in the Italian election headlines.

Today, we're seeing a boost in the risk-on cohort, small caps, cyclicals and high beta are doing their level best to finish the month out with pizazz - all of this is textbook from a tape reading standpoint.

But! 

I maintain the following:

Breaking all-time highs for the Dow and S&P should not be a walk in the park, especially with five years between peaks. We shouldn't be able to just rip through to the upside - we should be forced to earn it. This means bumping up against overhead resistance, a few false moves and maybe even a headfake 7-10% correction before we've built up a big enough head of steam to convincingly break through. Happens all the time in individual stocks and what are markets if not a collection of them?

The broadening top in the Dow that everyone sees may be just that - sometimes the crowd gets it right after all.

Narrowing leadership is still an issue. I watch the NYSE summation index to gauge this and I'm not loving what I see at this moment.

Sequestration's impact on the economy will be real - not catastrophic but absolutely real. I believe that public companies will use this event as an excuse to lower expectations for Q2, Q3. They'd be stupid not to.

The headlines emanating from the rolling fiscal cliffs from March through May will foster an atmosphere of increased correlation and market whippiness - a minor league version of 2011's risk-on, risk-off atmosphere.  This will lead to many short-term traders getting chopped up and all kinds of opportunities for fear-mongering in the press. prudent investors will ignore it all and stay the course.

Markets peaked out early in 2011 and 2012, it will be no surprise if we follow this seasonal pattern.

The worst thing in the world would be a quick drive higher here with utilities and consumer staples leading. It would make the correction worse because more dollars will get sucked in.

At a certain point this summer or fall, it will become apparent that the Sequester - while short-term painful - wasn't the worst thing in the world and that the economy, the consumer and corporate profits were able to weather it and make it through to the other side. Along with having the Fed on hold, this could set up the next leg higher with housing leading the recovery followed by increased hiring.

But the headline hurdles in front of us still must be surmounted, there is more work to do as estimates and expectations fall in line with reality, in my opinion.

And so we chill out and watch with mock amusement as a few million people get either too bullish or too bearish at exactly the wrong moments over the next few months. We keep our favorite holdings on the equity side of our portfolios, ignore the noise and await a better time to add more exposure.

This is an incomplete roadmap based on data, intuition, street smarts and experience. Things can and will change, of course, but right about now this posture seems to be the correct one.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The sequester is real, but not catastrophic
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/The-Reformed-Broker/2013/0228/The-sequester-is-real-but-not-catastrophic
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe