Trump's tax plan is twice as costly as Reagan’s

Donald Trump's proposed tax plan could add $11 trillion to federal debt over the next ten years with a revenue reduction that would be the largest in history.

|
Carolyn Kaster/AP/File
Presidential candidate Donald Trump takes to the stage at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland.

Donald Trump has proposed a series of tax cuts that would reduce federal revenue by $9.5 trillion over the next decade and add $11.2 trillion to the debt when interest costs are included. Trump's proposed revenue reduction would be the largest in history.

Trump's tax cut is bigger than those proposed by former Republican rivals Ted Cruz ($8.6 trillion), Marco Rubio ($6.8 trillion), and Jeb Bush ($6.8 billion). In fact, he would cut revenues by 4.0 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), nearly twice the 2.1 percent of GDP revenue loss from Ronald Reagan's tax cuts(net of his 1982 and 1984 tax hikes in response to debt concerns). Trump's cuts would also dwarf John Kennedy's (1.6 percent of GDP) and George W. Bush's (1.4 percent of GDP).

Individual income tax cuts (mostly slashing the top tax rate and increasing the standard deduction) would account for nearly three-fourths of Trump's revenue loss. His corporate tax changes would reduce revenue nearly $2 trillion over the coming decade and eliminating the estate tax would cost the Treasury another $200 billion. Trump has proposed limiting the value of some itemized deductions and some business preferences, but this new revenue would not be nearly enough to offset the cost of his cuts.

This article first appeared at TaxVox.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Trump's tax plan is twice as costly as Reagan’s
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Tax-VOX/2016/0722/Trump-s-tax-plan-is-twice-as-costly-as-Reagan-s
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe