Direct effects of debt crisis can't explain away British deficit

Some may say that Stefan Karlsson's assertion that an increasing British trade deficit is a sign of an overvalued pound, arguing instead that it reflects the euro area debt crisis. But Karlsson still maintains that there are other issues at play.

|
John Kolesidis/Reuters
A man walks outside an one euro shop in central Athens June 18, 2012. Greece's conservative leader pushed on Monday for a new coalition government after a narrow election victory, pledging to soften the debt-laden country's punishing austerity program despite opposition from Germany.

Those who disagree with my contention that the increasing British trade deficit is a sign of an overvalued pound may argue that the increase simply reflects the euro area debt crisis. 

However, during the latest year, the total monthly trade deficit in goods rose by £2.7 billion, from £7.4 billion to £10.1 billion, while the deficit with the euro area alone only rose by £1.6 billion, from £1.9 billion to £3.5 billion. The deficit also rose by £400 million with other non-euro area EU countries and by £700 million with countries outside the EU.

By contrast, Germany was able to compensate the drop in its trade surplus with other euro area countries by increasing its surplus with both non-euro area EU countries and with countries outside the EU.

So while the general drop in demand the crisis hit countries explain some of the British export weakness, an overvalued pound has weakened it further while also contributing to increased competitiveness of imported goods in the British market.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Direct effects of debt crisis can't explain away British deficit
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Stefan-Karlsson/2012/0618/Direct-effects-of-debt-crisis-can-t-explain-away-British-deficit
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe