Skip to footer

Will Tesla sue over state franchise law restrictions?

Tesla Motors is weighing whether to sue in Federal court over various state franchise laws that prohibit it from selling Model S and Model X electric cars online to buyers.

|
Denis Balibouse/Reuters/File
A Tesla logo is pictured on the hub of a car during the second media day of the 86th International Motor Show in Geneva, Switzerland (March 2, 2016).

Coffins made by monks don't often figure into either legal decisions or the electric car industry, but they do at the moment.

Tesla Motors is weighing whether to sue in Federal court over various state franchise laws that prohibit it from selling Model S and Model X electric cars online to buyers.

Its lawyers were inspired by a 2013 legal decision that ruled a monastery could sell its coffins without requiring a funeral-director's license.

The news comes via a feature story in The Wall Street Journal, in which the company said it's prepared to take legal action if it feels the need.

For the moment, Tesla is relying on negotiated settlements in various states that generally permit it to open a specified number of Tesla Stores and service facilities.

At present, buyers can purchase Tesla cars online in roughly half the United States, though it is specifically prohibited from selling cars that way in six states that together represent almost one-fifth of the total U.S. car market.

Tesla's emergence as a major carmaker selling tens of thousands of cars a year has brought renewed focus to the often-arcane world of state franchise laws and the influence of car-dealer lobbyists on structuring those laws.

And the Federal government has started to take notice. Last May, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission urged Michigan to drop a recently-enacted ban on Tesla's direct sales.

The agency called the revisions to the state franchise laws, swiftly signed by governor Rick Snyder, nothing less than "protectionism" for car dealersthat is "likely harming...competition and consumers."

The FTC had earlier weighed in on state franchise laws that enshrine independent auto dealerships as the sole legal way that a citizen may purchase a new vehicle. 

In April 2014, a commentary on its "Competition Matters" blog referred to the state bans: "In this case and others, many state and local regulators have eliminated the direct purchasing option for consumers, by taking steps to protect existing middlemen from new competition."

The Commission called such franchise rules at the state level "bad policy for a number of reasons."

U.S. laws among different Federal circuit courts currently differ on whether requiring licensing for new entrants is legal even if the sole reason for such laws is to protect existing businesses from new competitors.

For now, according to the Journal, Tesla is taking a wait-and-see approach to any potential restraint-of-trade or "economic liberty" lawsuits.

One factor may be the outcome of Tesla's filing for a dealer license under the revised Michigan law.

This article first appeared in GreenCarReports.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Will Tesla sue over state franchise law restrictions?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2016/0331/Will-Tesla-sue-over-state-franchise-law-restrictions
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe