China tweaks electric-car plans to reward success, reduce fraud

China will be phasing out its electric-car subsidies in favor of other policies that authorities will believe yield greater gains.

|
Jason Lee/Reuters/File
A Volkswagen XL1 hybrid car is displayed at Auto China 2014 in Beijing (April 20, 2014).

Over the past few years, China's government has aggressively promoted electric cars in the hope that mass adoption will help alleviate the country's infamous air pollution.

But China's electric-car policies are now in flux.

The government previously relied on subsidies to encourage sales, a model also used in other countries.

Now, subsidies could be phased out, and policymakers are looking to other methods they believe will yield greater long-term gains.

The shift answers criticism that China's carmakers are too reliant on electric-car subsidies, and that the current system enables fraud, according a Financial Times report (subscription required).

At a meeting of the State Council last week, Premier Li Keqiang advocated shifting funds from subsidies to programs that would encourage technological advances and reward companies for meeting sales targets.

Subsidies for both manufacturers and consumers are largely credited with increasing Chinese electric-car sales fourfold, to 330,000 units in 2015.

Granted, some of those cars were likely low-speed neighborhood electric vehicles, or plug-in hybrids that may not be charged very often in regular use.

But there have been reports in the Chinese media of "fraudulent" claims by companies accepting government money.

This was apparently a contributing factor in the Finance Ministry's decision to phase out electric-car subsidies.

The ministry announced in January that it would not extend subsidies beyond 2021, when they are set to expire.

The government plans to cut subsidies by 20 percent over the next two years, and 40 percent between 2019 and 2020--before eliminating them all together in 2021.

Instead, Chinese policymakers may redirect funds to development of relevant technologies like batteries.

It is believed this will help produce electric cars that are more attractive to consumers, and give China a competitive advantage over other countries.

Chinese officials have long dreamed of the country becoming a leader in electric-car technology.

And China has a natural advantage in its large deposits of rare earth metals, which are used in battery cells.

But China's domestic car industry isn't as advanced as those of other countries; most large Chinese carmakers still operate under partnerships with foreign firms.

Potentially helping the domestic industry is a proposal to encourage "public institutions" and transit fleets to adopt electric vehicles.

In his speech at the recent State Council meeting, Premier Li proposed increasing the mandated percentage of electrified vehicles in public-institution fleets to 50 percent, from 30 percent.

As in other countries, government agencies in China tend to look to domestic manufacturers for their fleet vehicles.

The proposed mandate could provide a ready outlet for the electric cars, trucks, and buses that government officials want Chinese companies to build.

This article first appeared at GreenCarReports.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to China tweaks electric-car plans to reward success, reduce fraud
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2016/0314/China-tweaks-electric-car-plans-to-reward-success-reduce-fraud
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe