Chevy Camaro SS vs. Ford Shelby GT: Which 2016 sports car packs more punch?

The 2016 Chevy Camaro and Mustang Shelby both hit new heights in combining horsepower and handling, but does one have an edge over the other?

|
Carlos Osorio/AP/File
The 2016 Chevrolet Camaro unveiled during a news conference on Belle Isle Park in Detroit.

You know, sometimes it's tough to convince our friends and family that this is a tough job. Hard days and long nights. Real work.

Convincing them is about to get impossible. Who else runs buck wild with two of the raunchiest cars on the face of Planet Earth--on a school day?

We did. Drove 'em hard, and put 'em away wet in a Malibu-canyon grudge match.

In this corner, the 455-horsepower Chevy Camaro SS.

And in this corner--the 526-horsepower Ford Shelby GT350.

You've seen the test numbers, read the first drives--but which one would we daily? Which one would get us to ante up for a monthly payment? Which one would send us to traffic court more quickly? Let's dig in.

In case you hadn't realized it, we're in a golden age of horsepower and handling, and these two top guns are fully up to speed. Zero to 60 mph times of about four seconds, quarter-mile runs in the low 12s. These instant classics take aim right at each other.

In the Camaro's engine bay --a lascivious LT1 V-8 on loan from the Corvette. Trimmed out at 455 horsepower and 455 pound-feet of torque, it's an intimidating and sensational piece of hardware.

The Shelby? Oh, nothing but a flat-crank 5.2-liter V-8 with an 8250-rpm redline, that sounds like a Ferrari got hot and heavy with a NASCAR stocker, 526 horsepower, and 429 pound feet of torque. Yeah, just...just that.

Both of them stick it out with six-speed manual gearboxes--Chevy and Ford still #GiveAShift. And both are driven by their rear wheels, as the gods decreed.

We've driven both of these cars all over the country at this point. Around the hairy corkscrew at Laguna Seca, through the arroyo secas of New Mexico and Arizona, and here today, in and out of Malibu's crazy-tight canyon roads. They're both stunning machines, with some distinct perks.

The things we love about the Shelby, well, that's easy. The latest Mustang has finally ditched its live rear axle. There's an independent rear back there, and it makes a world of difference. It's a little too softly sprung in even the Mustang GT, but the Shelby GT350 irons all that out, polishing the 'Stang to a high gloss.

It gets a Torsen rear diff, a set of magnetic dampers that make it firm when it needs to be, comfy when it can be. And that's before you get to the track-ready GT350 R, with its carbon-fiber wing and wheels and ungodly communicative Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires.

Those tires are magic, but even on the standard GT350, the Mustang has never been better. It's incredibly poised, with incredible grip. It mirrors your steering moves with confidence, and breaks away at the limit with lots of warning.

We're totally fanboying for the Camaro SS, too. With a few Cadillac bits on loan along with the 'Vette motor and first-time-ever magnetic dampers, it's like a greatest-hits package of GM performance pieces.

The Camaro's just never felt this lean, this tight, this well-bred, this right.

It's also a good bit smaller than the Mustang, than even the last Camaro--and every turn-in confirms that reality. You can aim the Camaro SS at corners like a lawn dart, and it takes unerring aim at the softest, most vulnerable point. Then it sticks the landing. Its 20-inch treads and magic-finger suspension do not play--it grips and grins through corners.

You'll have to physically restrain yourself from adding 10 miles per hour to the speedo every time.

These both have some down sides, but they're no deal-killers. There are a few more in the Mustang column, though.

It's bigger, longer, and a little heavier than the Camaro, and it feels like it. The interior's better than before, but there's a lot going on, visually. We're not in love with some of the janky little details like the light pipes up front or the why-bother passenger-side dash binnacle.

The Camaro? We dare you to back up in it without using the rearview camera. The back seat's not a back seat, it's a backpack containment facility. The cockpit's a big upgrade, but the sheetmetal hardly looks any different than the fifth-gen car.

We're in deep with both of these all-American sportscars, but one makes a little more sense.

The Shelby GT350 is a straight shooter, the no-excuses Mustang we've wanted forever. At a base price of about $50,000 and with GT350Rs going for well over $65,000, it's a car we'd track a few times of year--then seal up in a nitrogen bubble, under glass, ready to break into it when the autonomous cars finally come to bore us all to death.

The Camaro SS? At about $37,000 bone stock, you could practically have two of them for what a GT350R gets on eBay these days. It's a huge bargain, and at its fire-sale price, you can have two--one for play, one for keeps.

Whichever one you choose, just know this: The Mustang and Camaro aren't pony cars any more, not at these prices. And they're not muscle cars either, not with their next-level road manners.

They're real performers. Real sports cars.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Chevy Camaro SS vs. Ford Shelby GT: Which 2016 sports car packs more punch?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2015/1208/Chevy-Camaro-SS-vs.-Ford-Shelby-GT-Which-2016-sports-car-packs-more-punch
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe