Skip to footer

Self-driving cars could cut vehicle ownership in half

Google plans to start testing its fully-autonomous car prototype this summer, while automakers continue to develop their own technology. However, one analyst from Barclays predicts there will be a big drop in vehicle ownership rates and auto sales.

|
Tony Avelar/AP/File
Google's new self-driving prototype car sits during a demonstration at the Google campus in Mountain View, Calif. Brian Johnson, an analyst from Barclays predicts, there will be a big drop in vehicle ownership rates and auto sales.

The world’s top automakers and a handful of tech and supply firms are working hard to develop autonomous car technology, with the goal for most being a car capable of driving without any human intervention whatsoever. One of the leaders in this field is tech giant Google, which this summer plans to start testing on public roads a prototype of its fully autonomous car.

It’s well-documented that the proliferation of self-driving cars could lead to the end the professional driver, but an analyst from Barclays goes further and predicts that the technology could also lead to a massive drop in auto sales. That analyst is Brian Johnson, who in a report entitled Disruptive Mobility, obtained by Bloomberg, said vehicle ownership rates may fall by almost half as households move to having just one car that services the needs of each family member.

Compounding the issue are companies like Uber, which may end up combining the ride sharing concept with self-driving cars, meaning households could get by without even needing to own a car. Earlier this year it emerged that Uber had hired a whole team of engineers from Carnegie Mellon University's robotics center, most likely to work on an autonomous car. By eliminating the driver, the cost of using a ride-sharing service could drop considerably.

Johnson estimates that when most vehicles are self-driving—he predicts around 2025—new car sales here in the U.S. could drop by 40 percent to around 9.5 million vehicles annually, while the number of cars on American roads could decline by 60 percent to fewer than 100 million. It’s well-known that many drivers see driving as more of a chore than something pleasurable, so it’s clear there’ll be many out there ready to embrace autonomous cars.

Such a transition would likely hurt makers of mainstream autos the most, as the buyers of these products would likely be more willing to ditch the car than those shopping for a luxury auto. It shouldn’t come as a surprise then that Mercedes-Benz, another leader in the area of autonomous car technology, has already rolled out a luxurious, self-driving car concept.

There’s one other, much more worrying trend, and that’s regular driving being outlawed altogether at some point. It’s not hard to imagine lawmakers, touting the increased safety of autonomous cars eliminating human error, pushing for a ban on cars that still require a driver.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Self-driving cars could cut vehicle ownership in half
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2015/0520/Self-driving-cars-could-cut-vehicle-ownership-in-half
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe