Trump pushes crypto with White House summit and bitcoin reserve plan

A dozen people in dark suits sit, with President Trump in the middle, one one side of a long table at the White House.
|
Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks at the White House crypto summit at the White House in Washington, March 7, 2025.

Donald Trump’s new strategic bitcoin reserve follows an emerging pattern in his new administration: Announce a bold idea with few details and let the market – and the public at large – try to make sense of it.

At best, the reserve could become an early step in a monetary breakthrough. Much as it did with the internet and electronic communication 30 years ago, the United States could take the lead in developing and establishing the digital technology for the next generation of money and extend the dollar’s premier status in a digital world, analysts say.

At worst, it could be a crude attempt to boost existing digital currencies for family and friends and as payback for the industry’s support during Mr. Trump’s reelection campaign.

Why We Wrote This

President Donald Trump is pushing for a cryptocurrency reserve, and digital currency enthusiasts are hopeful. But critics see risks in efforts to boost the speculative tender.

“The devil is in the details,” says Christian Catalini, founder of the MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “I just don’t know which way this is going to go.”

On Thursday, the president announced the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and followed up Friday with a summit of industry leaders to lay out his plans for the proposed currency reserve. Initially, the reserve would be small, made up of the bitcoin the federal government has seized from criminal operations or received in civil forfeitures. By one estimate, the government’s bitcoin holdings amount to some $17 billion.

"Cryptocurrency czar" David Sacks stands in front of a microphone outside the White House.
Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters
"Cryptocurrency czar" David Sacks speaks to the media outside the White House just before the start of a White House crypto summit in Washington, March 7, 2025.

Oldest and largest

Bitcoin is the oldest and largest digital money, also known as cryptocurrency or crypto. If the government receives other cryptocurrencies, those would be held in a separate account.

“This will be a virtual Fort Knox for digital gold to be housed within the United States Treasury,” Mr. Trump said at Friday’s summit. He also called for Congress to pass regulations so that cryptocurrencies, especially those pegged to the dollar’s value, could thrive. “This is a tremendous opportunity for economic growth and innovation in our financial sector,’’ he said.

Here’s where the visions begin to collide, and things get messy.

To some crypto enthusiasts, it’s enough for the government to buy bitcoin and hope for the profits to roll in. Bitcoin is worth more than 18 times what it was worth five years ago. But the president seemed to throw cold water on that idea, saying that the digital money would be acquired without cost to the taxpayer.

And history is littered with examples of investments that zoomed up in value only to crash later.

To their severest critics, cryptocurrencies represent the newest investment bubble where prices will plunge eventually, just as they did for tulip bulbs in 17th-century Holland and subprime loans in 21st-century America. At least those assets were backed by something physical, these critics note. Cryptocurrencies’ value is based entirely on people’s trust that others will value the digital assets and that computer codes safeguard those assets from theft.

Investors’ ride has certainly proven bumpy thus far. In the past five years, bitcoin investors have seen the price rise 13-fold, lose three-quarters of its value, rise another seven-fold to above $100,000 in the months after Mr. Trump’s election, and fall 15% since his inauguration.

A U.S. reserve might help stabilize these wild gyrations a bit, says Padhraic Garvey, head of research for the Americas for ING Financial Markets. “But at the end of the day, this is a very speculative asset.”

Two workers in safety vests examine tall racks filled with computer equipment.
Steve Helber/AP/File
Workers look over racks of bitcoin data miners during construction of a bitcoin data center in Virginia Beach, Feb. 9, 2018.

Risky investment or innovative new product?

Many crypto industry leaders, as well as some members of Congress, are leery of the government holding something so risky. It could not only prove unprofitable but it could also damage the industry’s reputation. Mr. Trump also faces potential reputational risk since his sons run a cryptocurrency protocol company, World Liberty Financial, which reportedly invested more than $20 million in cryptocurrencies two days before the White House bitcoin summit. Critics see the reserve idea as an open door to conflicts of interest.

Instead of government buy-in to specific currencies, many cryptocurrency leaders are pushing for federal support for a cryptocurrency platform. They want regulations that would certify the good actors and weed out the bad ones, while allowing new entrants to develop innovative products.

“The USA needs to support research into crypto-assets and offer companies in the sector an attractive tax system to enable an ecosystem to flourish,” Cyril Grunspan, director of the Paris-based Institute of Crypto-Assets, writes in an email.

Questions for regulators

In this view, cryptocurrencies represent the future of money. It’s not just that they’re digital and can zip about the world far faster and more efficiently than today’s clunky financial system. The key is that they’re not controlled by any government or company.

Instead, these currencies come with their own electronic ledger system, which is validated every time a user makes a transaction. On one hand, such money is likely to challenge the big banks, payments systems, and other players benefitting from the current protocols. On the other hand, these players are eager to expand into crypto. On Friday, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said national banks could participate in some cryptocurrency activities, reversing a more restrictive stance during the Biden administration.

Skeptics worry that encouraging cryptocurrency enables money laundering by criminals or oligarchs around the world – a challenge even if better regulation could partially address it.

But if the U.S. can create the regulatory framework and infrastructure that encourages financial innovation, it could position itself – and the dollar – to thrive in this emerging world of money.

“How do we extend the dominance of the dollar?” asks Mr. Catalini, founder of the MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab. “In a world that’s becoming increasingly digital, we need to make those dollars available on the platforms of the future.”

And that adoption may come faster than most people expect, says Koray Caliskan, professor of economic sociology at the New School and author of “Data Money: Inside Cryptocurrencies, Their Communities, Markets, and Blockchains.”

In a quarter century, the internet became ubiquitous. Bitcoin is 15 years old, he points out.

“In 10 years, you’re going to see everyone using it.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Trump pushes crypto with White House summit and bitcoin reserve plan
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2025/0310/trump-crypto-reserve-summit-bitcoin
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe