US debt default: five ways it would affect you

Here's a breakdown of how a default or near default on US debt would affect Americans.

4. Taxpayers: no win, and a big potential loss

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
The US Capitol Dome is reflected in a fountain below the Senate in Washington. Republicans and Democrats have continued to butt heads throughout the government shutdown. A federal default would make the financial stakes much larger and the solutions more expensive, perhaps much more expensive.

Correcting the effects of default could take a great deal of time and some difficult decisions.

“Assume a week or two goes by with the government in default and finally the issue is resolved,” Reich says. “The mere fact that it has not paid its bills for two weeks would dramatically affect the trust creditors place in the US capacity to repay its debts. That trust would be seriously damaged for the future. Interest rates would be somewhat higher for a very long time. We are talking many years.”

Not everyone agrees, even among economists. It would not be as bad as, say, the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers, Capital Economics, a London-based research firm, wrote in recent analysis. "The crucial difference is that the US government would still be a going concern, with all the tax and spending powers of a sovereign state. Once the politicians reach a deal, there is no doubt that the US could return to servicing its debts as usual."

The answers vary – and are speculative – because investors worldwide would be operating in mostly uncharted territory.

The only time the US government has officially defaulted (some economists argue the US partially defaulted during the Great Recession when it moved off the gold standard) was in 1979. Congressional deadlock and an administrative error caused the government to pay bills seven days late. As Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics warned the Senate Budget Committee last month, that accidental default cost the nation tens of billions of dollars. And it was viewed as a fluke.

“The last government default caused a 60 basis point jump in the federal interest rate that didn’t just disappear even though the government paid the bills a few days later. It remained there for a month of so,” says Roberton Williams a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.

Higher interest rates on US debt would drive up the federal deficit, perhaps dramatically, leaving the government with two options that would be even starker than they are today: rein in spending or raise taxes.

Given the political brinkmanship that has fueled the current crisis, Republicans would probably resist any tax hikes while Democrats would surely dig in their heels on spending, Mr. Williams says. “We all know how difficult both of those conversations would be.” 

4 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.