JP Morgan $2 billion loss stirs memories of 2008 crisis

JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon dubs losses 'egregious,' but market analysts expect that, this time, the damage would be contained and not spread to the entire financial system.

|
Keith Bedford/Reuters
Jamie Dimon, chairman and chief executive of JP Morgan Chase and Co, speaks at the 2012 Simon Graduate School of Business' New York City Conference in New York on May 3.

The financial markets are holding up better than expected on Friday in the wake of JP Morgan Chase’s disclosure that it had a massive trade go bad, which would result in a loss of as much as $2 billion.

The disclosure, made by JP Morgan’s CEO, James Dimon – who termed the losses “egregious”– after the close on Thursday, brought back memories of bank bailouts and the 2008 financial crisis that led to the steepest post-war recession. This time, however, market analysts said they believed the damage would be contained and would not spread to the entire financial system. The widely watched Dow Jones Industrial Average was off only about 50 points after 30 minutes of trading but JP Morgan stock was off about 9 percent.

“The embarrassment factor is more significant than the economic factor,” says Fred Dickson, market strategist at D.A. Davidson & Co. in Lake Oswego, Ore. “The landscape is different than 2008 when all the global banks were massively overleveraged and under reserved.”

Four years ago as the housing market collapsed, the investment bank Lehman Brothers failed, which resulted in a cascading economic crisis. Mr. Dickson says few people realized the importance of Lehman in funding corporate America. By contrast, he says, the JP Morgan trading losses are self-contained to a trading department.

“This is not the blowup of an entire product that affects the entire economic system,” he explains. “The loss is not systemic.”

Nevertheless, other analysts say the JP Morgan disclosure is unsettling. “It’s three years after the financial crisis and Dodd-Frank [banking reform legislation] is not fully implemented, but to think a major financial institution does not have the internal controls to head off the losses before they become so big is a problem of concern,” says Pete Davis of Davis Capital Investments, which advises Wall Street firms on Washington legislation.

Mr. Dimon, in a hastily called conference call with securities analysts on Thursday, said the losses stemmed from huge bets the bank made that the economic recovery would continue to be strong. JP Morgan had invested heavily in corporate bonds but then suddenly lost money when the value of those bonds fell as the economy slowed.

“It points to flaws in the risk management in that bank,” says Mr. Dickson.

What made Dimon’s disclosure especially embarrassing for the bank is that he had argued that regulators should give the banks more leeway to hedge their positions. Under the Dodd-Frank regulations, which aim to limit the damage to the economy from a large failure in the banking system, banks must shed their proprietary stock and bond trading departments by July 2013.

Despite the unexpected trading losses, Dimon said the bank was still profitable with after tax earnings of about $4 billion. In early trading, JP Morgan stock was down $3.35 a share to $37.40, or about 8 percent. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 32 points as of 10:45 a.m.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to JP Morgan $2 billion loss stirs memories of 2008 crisis
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2012/0511/JP-Morgan-2-billion-loss-stirs-memories-of-2008-crisis
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe