NFL draft: Why Andrew Luck's rookie salary has shrunk

NFL draft 2012 top picks Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III won't be making the huge money of some of their top pick predecessors, like Sam Bradford and Matthew Stafford. New rules limiting rookie salaries ensure NFL draft 2012 picks have to prove their worth on the field before making the big bucks.

|
Mary Altaffer/AP
Quarterback Andrew Luck throws the ball during the NFL Play 60 Youth Football Festival, Wednesday, April 25, 2012, in New York. Luck, who will be the top pick by the Indianapolis Colts in the 2012 NFL Draft, won't be signing a contract nearly as big as some of the top quarterbacks drafted in previous years.

In 2010, the St. Louis Rams picked Oklahoma quarterback Sam Bradford first overall in the NFL draft. The following summer, he signed a six-year, $78 million deal that included $50 million in guaranteed bonus money, all before playing a single down in the NFL. Laced with performance-based incentives that topped out at a potential $86 million payout, it was the richest rookie contract in the history of the NFL.

And it probably will hold that record for some time because of new salary cap rules applying to rookie pay. 

This year, when the Indianapolis Colts draft Andrew Luck with the first pick in the 2012 NFL draft, he will probably sign a deal worth somewhere in the neighborhood of $23 million – a comparatively paltry sum. That’s because the NFL’s new collective bargaining agreement (CBA), reached last summer with the players, has stricter rules for the way that a team’s salary cap can be used for rookie salaries.

Here’s how it works: One of the major terms of the CBA was a rookie wage scale, in which first round draft picks can only sign four-year deals. The team has the option to add a fifth year to the contract, if the player performs well. Carolina Panthers quarterback Cam Newton, last year’s top pick, signed a four-year deal for $22.3 million. The Panthers have the option to pick him up for the fifth year, for which he would earn the average of the Top 10 quarterback salaries in the league.

There is a set pool of money that a team is allowed to spend on rookies (last year, it totaled $874 million). Unlike the old system, that sum has to include bonuses and performance incentives. Under the old rules, Bradford’s $50 million guaranteed bonus was allowed to exist outside the rookie pool, because he wouldn’t be paid that guaranteed money until after his first season. Under the new system, money paid to rookies applies to both a team’s salary cap and the rookie pool, making huge bonus guarantees like Bradford’s impossible.

This is good for the league, and the draft, in several ways. For one, rookie contract holdouts will be a thing of the past, as there is only a set amount of money available even for top-flight draft picks. Last year’s draft crop was the first affected by the new rules, and most rookie contracts were signed within a week of the start of the allowable contract negotiation period, in late July.

It makes the draft more exciting, too, because teams will be trading and jockeying more actively for top positions. Before, the exorbitant amount of money involved made the top slots huge financial risks for NFL teams, so there wasn’t as much activity at the top of the board.  A bad pick, like the Raiders $36 million bust on Jamarcus Russell in 2007, could have salary cap repercussions for years. Now, teams can pursue potential stars without the huge downside, so trading up for top picks will likely become more common. The Redskins, for instance, traded up to the Ram’s No. 2 overall pick for 2012, positioning themselves to draft highly-touted Baylor quarterback Robert Griffin III (considered by many to be just as good as Andrew Luck).

Finally, it leaves more cap money for proven veterans, who will no longer see their earnings eclipsed by rookies, many of whom may not see any playing time for a few seasons. When Bradford’s deal was done, he got more bonus money than either Tom Brady or Eli Manning, both Super Bowl winners renewing their own contracts that year. Another side effect: minimum salaries for all players have gone up, and minimum salaries for veterans are higher than those of rookies. A rookie now earns at least $375,000 per season, a second-year player $450,000, and so on.

Going high in the draft is still a boon for players like Luck and Griffin. But they won’t be breaking the bank for their respective teams.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to NFL draft: Why Andrew Luck's rookie salary has shrunk
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2012/0426/NFL-draft-Why-Andrew-Luck-s-rookie-salary-has-shrunk
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe