Technology 2012: Four tech trends to watch

3. Video technology: Beware what you televise

AP/File
In this frame grab image taken from amateur video and acquired by APTN, protesters are seen amid a burning vehicle in Douz, Tunisia, in January 2011. Such videos spread throughout the Arab world, which saw three authoritarian regimes toppled by popular revolts last year.

Citizen-recorded videos fanned the flames of the Arab Spring into a regional wildfire. From police repression in Tunisia and protests in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, through the violent final minutes of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi’s life, amateur cellphone videos spread through the Arab world not only via social media and SMS (short message service), but also on YouTube. From there, the Al Jazeera network beamed them into millions of homes across the Arab world, where television ownership still exceeds Internet access. When the Tunisian and Egyptian governments shut down national Internet and mobile phone networks, satellite dishes kept citizens informed.

Video is ubiquitous – whether on TV, online, or used privately for security and defense. This continuous capture of imagery will continue to be a mixed blessing in 2012. Video technology can force leaders to be just, or curb crime and terrorism, but issues of ethics and civil liberties underlie both uses.

Since 9/11, major US cities have heavily upgraded their surveillance equipment. Emulating the Ring of Steel girding London’s financial district, New York City’s Lower Manhattan Security Initiative includes cameras, license plate scanners, and dangerous-substance detectors. Although the NYPD’s privacy guidelines include deletion of video within 30 days of its recording, the New York Civil Liberties Union has questioned what it considers indiscriminate surveillance, especially of protests.

Video technology also makes our military more efficient and precise, but can carry heavy costs. Live video brought the Osama bin Laden mission to the White House Situation Room. Pilots based in America use drone aircraft to track and kill terrorist leaders, but the Pentagon reports that some pilots suffer from burnout and high stress, both from the monotonous work and the burden of attacking people they have watched for months.

The debate over video’s proper role will continue beyond 2012. As with social media, easy access to cellphone cameras will lead more people to share their lives online – to their occasional regret, as evidence of misbehavior slips out of their control. The trend of political “gotcha" videos, as citizens trail politicians to capture flubs or outbursts, will only accelerate during the presidential campaign.

With cameras in nearly every phone, anyone can share their personal experience – whether funny, tumultuous, or oppressed. But the chance that we can be captured at our worst moment might lead us to stop sharing and start hiding.

3 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.