Man Booker Prize: Two American writers make the cut for the shortlist

In addition to the American contenders Karen Joy Fowler for 'We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves' and Joshua Ferris of 'To Rise Again at a Decent Hour,' other nominees include Richard Flanagan for 'The Narrow Road to the Deep North' and Ali Smith for 'How to Be Both.'

|
Brett Hall Jones/Penguin Group US/AP
Author Karen Joy Fowler's novel 'We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves' is one of the books to have made the cut for the Man Booker Prize.

Two Americans made the cut for the shortlist for the Man Booker Prize this year, the first that the prize could be won by writers from anywhere in the world as long as their novel was published in English and released in the UK.

American authors Karen Joy Fowler of “We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves” and Joshua Ferris of “To Rise Again at a Decent Hour” are two of the writers who are on the shortlist for the prize. The others are Neel Mukherjee for “The Lives of Others,” Ali Smith for “How to Be Both,” Howard Jacobson for “J,” and Richard Flanagan for “The Narrow Road to the Deep North.”

The winner will be revealed on Oct. 14.

“As the Man Booker prize expands its borders, these six exceptional books take the reader on journeys around the world, between the UK, New York, Thailand, Italy, Calcutta and times past, present and future," A.C. Grayling, who is heading up the judges panel, said as he announced the shortlist, according to the Guardian. "We had a lengthy and intensive debate to whittle the list down to these six. It is a strong, thought-provoking shortlist which we believe demonstrates the wonderful depth and range of contemporary fiction in English.”

The inclusion of two American writers out of six contenders seems to have soothed the fears of some of those who thought the US would overtake the prestigious prize. BBC arts correspondent Rebecca Jones wrote that “fears the prize would be swamped by American writers have proved unfounded” and Telegraph writer Hannah Furness wrote that in the shortlist, “British writers ward off US contenders." 

Monitor fiction critic Yvonne Zipp called Fowler’s novel “outstanding… her new novel will land with the force of a haymaker,” while James Parker of Barnes & Noble found “Rise” to be “incoherent” at times and “the elements do not, finally, knit. Which is a shame, because the inner mystery – that is, the mystery of existence – is worth addressing. You might say that it is the only thing worth addressing. And Ferris has made a sprawling, brawling, linguistically illuminated attempt to do so. My opinion? He'll get it right next time.” In addition, Melissa H. Pierson of B&N wrote of Flanagan’s writing in “Road,” “Flanagan is a writer so profoundly observant that every other phrase manages to be compact and expansive at once. If this sounds like the definition of poetry, it should… [The book] is not perfect… But it dares the big revelation.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Man Booker Prize: Two American writers make the cut for the shortlist
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2014/0909/Man-Booker-Prize-Two-American-writers-make-the-cut-for-the-shortlist
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe