Skip to footer

3 perfect summer books for Anglophiles

Calling all Anglophiles: Here are 3 new summer titles that will take you to London without requiring you to leave your armchair.

2. 'The Innocents,' by Francesca Segal

  • By Yvonne Zipp Monitor fiction critic

Adam Newman and Rachel Gibson are the perfect couple. Everyone at Temple Fortune in northwest London thinks so, and who is Adam to tell them differently?

Not only does Adam love Rachel, but he loves Rachel's family, especially her dad, Lawrence, his boss at the law firm. Oh, it took him 13 years to propose, but after all, they've been together since they were 16. Then Rachel's younger cousin Ellie Schneider, a model, comes to London from New York after Columbia kicks her out for appearing in what Ellie calls an art film and Adam's friends call porn.

Francesca Segal's debut novel, “The Innocents,” takes Edith Wharton's “The Age of Innocence” and successfully plunks it down in a tight-knit, modern Jewish community. Adam is just as self-satisfied and unaware as Wharton's main character, while Rachel's total lack of ambition makes her a capable mirror for May. Ellie, however, seems like a step down from Countess Olenska.

Part of the countess' appeal was that she was the older woman. By making Rachel's rival younger, thinner, and blonder, Segal also makes the romantic triangle less interesting. Adam would rather date a model? What guy wouldn't?

However, Ellie does pull off world-weary at age 24 admirably, and it's easy to believe she knows more than Adam about the community that's held her at arm's length at the same time that it embraced him.

Where “The Innocents” succeeds is in its warm-hearted community conspiracy. It's easy for a reader to see how being cut off from Lawrence, grandmother Ziva and the rest of Temple Fortune would be a lifelong loss, whereas ostracism from the chilly mores of high society, 19th-century New York always seemed like a blessing.

2 of 3
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.